Absolutism Vs Relativism: An Unfinished Collation -
Quite
recently, an acquaintance who I wouldn’t incline to refer to as close, but
nonetheless for whom I harbor great respect, took the daggers out against ‘relativism’ as a concept.
Because the
comment was made informally and in passing, amid a ‘non-agendered’ chit-chat, I
do not recall the precise words he employed, but what he said effectively equated relativism to escapism - a post-modernist world-view
whose proponents seek an easy way out of the responsibility of taking moral
stands on societal essentials, especially paired-categories like good/bad,
life/death, rich/poor, moral/immoral, acceptable/unacceptable amongst many
other such dualities; effectually allowing themselves the license of
gallivanting without sufficient check, in the libertarian whirlwind of life.
The
interlocutor in question happens to be a fellow of the literary sodality to
which I subscribe – the Kampala-based Lantern
Meet of Poets.
While, as
is my wont, I would be quick to disagree with this acquaintance on several
counts; I will remember my manners and spare the reader the anguish of my usual
direct, even impudent contentiousness.
I will
instead, in response to my friend, attempt to explain a few other social
realities within the conundrum of absolutism vis-a-vis relativism, in an attempt
to make a case for the latter ahead of the former.
Additionally
though, whether, in the context of the discourse we had - my friend's remedy to this identified malaise of
‘relativism’, would be the equally contentious concept of ‘absolutism’, is a
claim whose certainty I cannot establish; since we didn't talk long enough to respectively defend diametrically opposed positions.
I will now
begin my arguments.
I have up
to this point in the revolutionary journey of my life, invariably come across
as radically oriented - a fire-breathing, implacable proponent for my point of
view; whether the issue under contention be as mundane as whether the sky is blue or clear; or as elevated as our society requiring cultural conscientization,
ahead of political healing.
It would be
helpful, at this point, for the record, and also to bring it to the reader’s
attention, in a bodacious show of my ‘copious’ modesty, to reveal that
I have almost always not-quite-won those bouts of contention.
But I
digress – and must return to the main issue of the article; let the ignominy of
my erstwhile mishaps, remain a non-issue.
As I was
saying, I have for long, hitherto, been a strong-headed champion of absolutist ideas – believing that
things in life are, indeed must be, quite clear-cut and categorical.
It is this
understanding of the world as a black and white affair, which has been, hitherto, the
guiding principle of my approach to life; and that has informed the bulk of my
conclusions.
Employing the
phrase ‘hitherto’ should also implicitly signal a sense of transition, as far as my ideological campus is concerned.
I would
thus hedge my bets by saying that mine is a mentality in en-route, this transience providing the encasement for the mind-set that puts
forward this article.
As I have
said above already, absolutism, in my mind’s thinking, trumps relativism as a
healthy and progressive life concept.
For, the
question needs arise - why must we dilly-dally about anything in life?
Why must we have our cake, and concomitantly seek to eat it?
- Unfinished on account of extenuation -
Comments
Post a Comment